<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c978</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:15:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130522/01382223168/new-york-times-tells-startup-it-cant-even-mention-ny-times.shtml#c978</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If that's the case, why can't I go to Flickr, download images, and use them in a TV advertisement? The ad wouldn't be "competing" with the photo. And Scroll Kit actually had the replica available online, which is very clearly in conflict with the Times' efforts to monetize.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>It's all blackmail</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1078</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[DanZee]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:14:42 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1078</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think Kim Dotcom is just being honest about something that takes place every day, namely corporate lawyers using legal blackmail to make other companies and individuals do what they want.  Here, Dotcom will give Amazon, etc., a license to use his patent in return for joining him on his lawsuit and loaning him money until he can unfreeze his assets.  Companies make these sorts of arrangements all the time.  Kim's just being more upfront about it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>75 million customers? That 75 million simultaneous lawsuits</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c336</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:14:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130521/20101423164/att-says-you-can-use-any-video-streaming-app-you-want-just-as-soon-as-it-can-get-meter-running.shtml#c336</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You signed away your right to class action lawsuits against at$t.<br />
<br />
There seem to be a lot of good minds around here. Surely a kick starter campaign could be set up. Flood the courts with 750 million individual suites. Setup the paperwork to where you sign your name, send it to court.<br />
Even if only ten percent completed their cases...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1059</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[average_joe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:14:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1059</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>The DMCA doesn't apply in criminal cases? The safe harbor is for criminal charges too.</i><br />
<br />
Why's it stupid? I don't say things unless I have some basis for thinking it. See, for example, Copyhype: <a href='http://www.copyhype.com/2012/01/megaupload-and-the-dmca/' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.copyhype.com/2012/01/megaupload-and-the-dmca/</a><br />
<br />
Even if the safe harbors were possible, there would be no protection for a person who otherwise would meet of standard of a criminal infringer.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c51</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:13:23 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/blog/wireless/articles/20130523/01030023182/man-butt-dials-911-while-discussing-murder-plot.shtml#c51</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["Those "smartphones" really can be smart sometimes."<br />
<br />
Not smart, it's just basic survival instinct. If you were stuck next to someone else's butt, you'd dial 911 too.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1057</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greevar]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:12:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1057</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Don't reply to the trolls, just hit report and spend your time talking to a rational person instead.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Read for comprehension!</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1055</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:11:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1055</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Of course it's patent trolling (assuming the patent as granted is not 100% valid and correct or has obvious prior art - that has yet to be seen). But, Mike hasn't denied that it is. AJ and his ilk are just busy creaming themselves because he didn't write that specific phrase. They're so used to lying about the points he's made about Dotcom in previous articles, they've deluded themselves into thinking he supports everything he does.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1041</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greevar]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:10:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1041</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[By christian scientists.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1039</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:09:15 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1039</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[does the US government violate this patent for some of their secure services (IRS etc)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: what a freak, and freaking JOKE</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1020</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:08:32 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1020</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You know, if you guys added clarity and sanity to your comments, you might not look like idiots and people might even agree with you.<br />
<br />
You can always tell when the article is essentially correct. Half the trolls try to deflect from the article, while others either attack the author or act like they just ate the strange looking mushroom they found in the back of the fridge.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c836</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eponymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:04:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130521/17321623162/released-video-silva-beating-shows-his-last-moments-video-actual-beating-still-missing.shtml#c836</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It can mean the difference between murder and manslaughter, or between murder and aggravated murder, but in any case the direct actions of LEOs appears to have caused the death of a citizen.<br />
<br />
With pepper spray and tasers readily available, I see this as a complete and utter failure to use the appropriate response to a noncompliant subject.  Hell, with 9 of them, they could have just dog-piled onto the guy and subdued him with their sheer weight while someone got cuffs on him.  Close enough to strike with a blunt object is close enough to use multiple other tactics to subdue, especially when fully equipped officers are dealing with an unarmed person.<br />
<br />
I truly hope they burn for this savagery.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1000</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:01:49 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c1000</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is such a ludicrous charge coming from you.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: what a freak, and freaking JOKE</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c983</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 08:01:02 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c983</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Literally no one said it was ok...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Racketeering</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c980</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:59:58 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c980</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Even more reasonable:<br />
<br />
"If I loose I'm going to go bankrupt and this patent is going to be sold to who knows who and if I win my funds are unfrozen and I can reimburse you."]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c976</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:57:59 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c976</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[So you're mad that he's got a consistent position but doesn't always use the same words to describe it?  That's your idea of a 'marked contrast,' espousing the same opinion over the same issue only being less angry about it?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c959</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:54:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c959</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No one said it was different?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c951</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:53:36 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c951</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Forgot to say, the fact that the man got a patent on two factor authentication just shows how poorly the patent process is conducted.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Is that it?</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c939</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:53:18 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c939</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No, it doesn't "makes patent trolling sound like a wonderful and acceptable way to do things".  It brands patent trolling a bad strategic move that especially doesn't make sense in this case since the perpetrator is already facing racketeering charges.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: &quot;I believe in sharing knowledge and ideas for the good of society.&quot;</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c915</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:52:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c915</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>But what he ACTUALLY does is steal the income stream from the work of others, and funnel it into his OWN pocket. Geez, that's just sickening coming from a grifting millionaire.</i><br />
<br />
What, and record labels don't?<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110404/12211913771/record-labels-may-owe-artists-close-to-2-billion-lawsuits-ramp-up-with-rick-james-lead.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110404/12211913771/record-labels-may-owe-artists-close-to-2-billion-lawsuits-ramp-up-with-rick-james-lead.shtml</a><br />
<br />
Besides, Mike regularly calls them both out when they do something wrong or stupid, as Dotcom just did. <br />
<br />
But don't let your unrequited passion for Mike cloud your judgement or anything!]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Prior Art</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c913</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:52:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130523/00174423181/kim-dotcom-threatens-to-sue-google-facebook-twitter-over-2-factor-authentication-patent-if-they-dont-help-him.shtml#c913</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Last I checked, the prior art requirement doesn't require that a previous patent exists. It just requires that a device that performs the functions stated in the patent in the same or a similar manner exists.<br />
<br />
Take the wheel as an example. The wheel (in it's traditional form, not the strange/wacky modern reinventions of the wheel) was never patented yet, you can't just go to the USPTO and say "I want to patent the wheel". You can't because prior art exists.<br />
<br />
Of course, IANAL, if anyone wants to pitch it, please do.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>