<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Latest Techdirt Comments</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/</link>
<description>Easily digestible tech news....</description>
<item>
<title>Re: STOP IT!!</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c316</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Groove Tiger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:45:37 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/16203623112/nintendo-exchanges-goodwill-control-issues-mass-monetization-claims-lets-play-videos.shtml#c316</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was going to record a let's play but my camera's shut got stucked.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Template hit! Anomaly, lawsuit, won't ever affect anyone else.</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/10535223120/indian-publishing-firm-cant-take-little-criticism-threatens-blogger-with-1-billion-lawsuit-criminal-charges.shtml#c206</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Groove Tiger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:42:19 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/10535223120/indian-publishing-firm-cant-take-little-criticism-threatens-blogger-with-1-billion-lawsuit-criminal-charges.shtml#c206</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Oh lawks, that was covered here yesterday.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml</a><br />
<br />
As usual, out_of_the_blue is out_of_the_loop.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1774</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:40:46 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1774</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"No matter who your friends are, your viewpoints support infringement lawsuits and the lawyers who benefit from them. And nothing else."</i><br />
<br />
This can't be emphasised enough. AJ is just like so many other copyright maximilists who <i>claim</i> to be all about supporting artists, but on closer inspection their arguments are clearly in support of a system that makes a lot of money from artists (via recored companies) but offers nothing in return.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Template hit! Anomaly, lawsuit, won't ever affect anyone else.</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/10535223120/indian-publishing-firm-cant-take-little-criticism-threatens-blogger-with-1-billion-lawsuit-criminal-charges.shtml#c183</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:37:39 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/10535223120/indian-publishing-firm-cant-take-little-criticism-threatens-blogger-with-1-billion-lawsuit-criminal-charges.shtml#c183</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[And yet here you are, obsessing as usual.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1759</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:27:14 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1759</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[He will <i>never</i> name them. Chances are he's simply making them up to bolster his weak arguments, but if not, I imagine they'd be horribly embarrassed to be publicly linked to someone like AJ.<br />
<br />
Of course I'm happy to be proven wrong on this...]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Quick to Judge and WRONG</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/09590723059/this-weeks-bad-photoshopping-lesson-comes-scientology.shtml#c510</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Groove Tiger]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:15:04 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130513/09590723059/this-weeks-bad-photoshopping-lesson-comes-scientology.shtml#c510</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Must be fresh out of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hole_%28Scientology%29" rel="nofollow">The Hole</a>.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re:</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c907</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:14:17 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c907</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"You have your opinion but consider one half of humanity disagrees. "</i><br />
<br />
Really? Half of humanity believes we should be under the control of religious police? You sure about that?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Saudi Religious Police</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c896</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMT]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 23:00:07 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/07281823105/saudi-religious-police-anyone-using-twitter-has-lost-this-world-his-afterlife.shtml#c896</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>"I don't think it's religion causing this...<br />
<br />
...people are the problem."</i><br />
<br />
Religion <i>is</i> people. The problem is religious people.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>The military...</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20101208/01331612181/dailydirt-getting-online-education.shtml#c151</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[JackOfShadows]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:54:26 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20101208/01331612181/dailydirt-getting-online-education.shtml#c151</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If you are looking for why, what, when, where and how distance learning should be done, just go look at the military.  We've been doing it for decades.  Correspondence, computerized, online, peer-to-peer, temporarily assigned (non-military) professors (even if not degreed in that subject but know how), whatever.  The subjects can be pretty much anything and help is usually close to hand given our diverse backgrounds and skills.  The really nice thing, as I've found from personal experience, is being able to challenge anything in the courses, even subject requirements, and actually see the changes made rapidly to correct a poor to awful situation.  Been there, done that, burned the t-shirt.<br />
<br />
I've heard, damn near my whole life given both parents (then) serving, how unintelligent service members are and similarly poorly educated.  The day of the dumb private or hick bosun's mate are far in the past.  Part and parcel in the services today, you are not only a student, you are expected to be an instructor if only in your professional field(s).  And if no teacher is handy, do it at a distance and practice locally.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c548</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[laughing at you]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:53:55 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/06185923116/rice-university-professor-skynets-gonna-take-ur-jerbs.shtml#c548</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA["huge market in handwoven rugs"<br />
<br />
Haha, yeah that's a massive industry. Right up there with aerospace and energy.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c263</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[sophisticatedjanedoe]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:46:40 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c263</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[B- on geography. My domain name is registered in Bahamas, not Panama.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c241</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:23:01 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c241</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Wow, you've truly lost it.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c236</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[horse with no name]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:15:57 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c236</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Usual crap on this site.  I am anonymous here because I don't stand for anything except my own opinion.  I am not taking to the soap box.<br />
<br />
Running a "stop copyright trolls" site and then hiding your identity seems a bit of a failure, don't you think?  Stop the trolls, but I am so scared I won't tell anyone who I am?  It's about on par with pressure cooker bombs in a crowd.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c219</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rikuo]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:53:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c219</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[You're criticizing them for being anonymous...while being anonymous yourself? Tell me...why is it that the sheer hypocrisy you displayed wasn't readily apparent to you?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c195</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:33:05 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c195</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Can I have your mirrors, since you're clearly not using them?]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: Re: Even Mike can't help misreading the Constitution</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1736</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[tanj]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:25:51 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15445423110/framework-copyright-reform.shtml#c1736</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The laws against theft would only apply to the original taking. Any subsequent copies would not be covered.<br />
<br />
For example an author writes a book. The book is stolen and a copy is sold to a publisher. The copy is not stolen property and subsequent copies would also not be stolen property. So the author's only recourse would be against the original thief.<br />
<br />
Here is a case that deals with this issue.<br />
<br />
<a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowling_v._United_States_' rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowling_v._United_States_</a>(1985)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: How droll</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c172</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[[citation needed or GTFO]]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:55:16 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c172</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[...says the anonymous tech blog troll hiding behind a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Horse_with_No_Name" rel="nofollow">"gold RIAA"</a> handle.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re:</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/17551823088/floridas-redlight-program-designed-to-make-driving-more-dangerous-shortening-yellow-lights.shtml#c444</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous Coward]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:18:24 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130514/17551823088/floridas-redlight-program-designed-to-make-driving-more-dangerous-shortening-yellow-lights.shtml#c444</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I was with you t the point where you said that what the cops wanted was less people running red lights.  They don't want that.  They want the money generated from writing more tickets.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: Re: When everything we do is monitored</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c2270</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suzanne Lainson]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 20:01:11 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130516/15583223111/congress-grandstanding-over-google-glass-privacy-concerns-next-up-privacy-concerns-over-your-eyes.shtml#c2270</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Each time I read my response, I'm not sure if I'm very clear about what I am suggesting. So let me try again.<br />
<br />
I think we have very limited privacy these days and most of the monitoring is coming from private industry. I read a lot of articles directed to advertisers and marketers. The data collection companies are very proud of the fact that they are compiling a ton of data on everyone. <br />
<br />
And many tech companies are proud of what they have developed to allow them to use the latest devices to track everything and everyone.<br />
<br />
The only time these companies raise the privacy issue is when they want to paint government in a negative light. <br />
<br />
And yet, private companies are also working with government. I am skeptical that much is done in DC without corporate input. So whatever policies are coming out of DC have probably been shaped to benefit someone's bottom line.<br />
<br />
I think we need to discuss privacy on a big scale and what that means to everyone. The positives are that all of these monitors could improve lives. The negatives are that this info can be used against us. (And don't assume government is the only guilty party here. Insurance companies, credit companies, banks, and so on would love to know who to exclude as customers.)]]></content:encoded>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: There you go</title>
<link>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c163</link>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry]]></dc:creator>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 19:58:10 PDT</pubDate>
<guid>http://blog.techdirt.com/articles/20130517/22104223137/sophisticatedjanedoe-fightcopyrighttrolls-favorite-techdirt-posts-week.shtml#c163</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[No one cares and yet, here you are.<br />
<br />
Hmmmm.]]></content:encoded>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>